Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 230W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 +3320%
11.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
192
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
230W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU104
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy