Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 200W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 +7154%
23.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
640.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
192
Shading Units
7168
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
369.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.65 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
369.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
200W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA102
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy