Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050 +215%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF100
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy