Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 12GB VRAM RTX A2000 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 12 GB +2350%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
26
192
Shading Units
3328
16
TMUs
104
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA106
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
12 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy