Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile +1315%
10.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
752 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
576
Shading Units
3072
48
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
339.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.75 TFLOPS
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.87 TFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
339.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
TU104
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
N19E-Q5-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy