Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +4862%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
640
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

68W
TDP
21W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy