Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1200MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +455%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
26
640
Shading Units
3328
40
TMUs
104
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
12 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy