Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 200W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1650MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 +1543%
23.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
1050 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
640.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
640
Shading Units
7168
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
369.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.65 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
369.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy