Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +1627%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
8192
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy