Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +520%
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
1920
40
TMUs
120
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy