Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile +1172%
10.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
640
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
339.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.75 TFLOPS
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.87 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
339.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q5-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy