Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 450W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
13760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +5801%
44.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
14336
48
TMUs
896
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
450W
-
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
100 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy