Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA GRID M40

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA GRID M40

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 8GB VRAM GRID M40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M40 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
GRID M40 +5%
0.793 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
793.3 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM107
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy