Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M +2051%
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
576
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
34W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G96
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy