Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M +917%
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
576
Shading Units
32
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G84
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy