Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M +549%
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT216
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy