Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.8GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000 +65%
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK106
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy