Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 +590%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
2880
48
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK110B
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy