Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 420 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M +3322%
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 420
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
576
Shading Units
8
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G98
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy