Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
6848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Mobile +2857%
22.27 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
58
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
7424
48
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.27 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.27 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA103
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
22 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
165W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy