Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile +385%
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
576
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU117
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy