Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M +21%
0.753 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
576
Shading Units
240
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
188W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT200B
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy