Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro P600 +10%
1.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1329 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
768
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP107
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy