Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M +340%
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF108
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy