Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro GP100 +853%
10.34 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1304 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP100
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy