Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M +43%
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
576
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy