Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA A10M

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA A10M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
A10M +2062%
23.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
7168
64
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA102
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy