Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000 +292%
4.252 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
861 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM204
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy