Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M +123%
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
768
Shading Units
256
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF100
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy