Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 180W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000 +718%
8.873 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1607 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
768
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
180W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP104
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy