Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
9984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
RTX A6000 +3471%
38.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
84
768
Shading Units
10752
64
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA102
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy