Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A4000

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
RTX A4000 +1668%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
768
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
140W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA104
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GA104-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy