Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +775%
9.492 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
768
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU104B
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy