Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +1668%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
AD104
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy