Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile +541%
6.953 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
893 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
768
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA106
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
12 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy