Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 +2081%
23.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
640.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
7168
64
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
369.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.65 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
369.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
200W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA102
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy