Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090 +7%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1404 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
134.8GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
3 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy