Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +789%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1404 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
134.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
350W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy