Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1395MHz vs 784MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4 +510%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
1344
Shading Units
4608
112
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
260W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU102
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy