Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +268%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K4200 +408%
178
Quadro K2000M
35
OctaneBench
Quadro K4200 +166%
32
Quadro K2000M
12
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK107
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy