Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +16107%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 130M
0.013 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
1344
Shading Units
8
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.80 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

108W
TDP
10W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G86
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
G86-613-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy