Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (1335MHz vs 784MHz)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +159%
5.468 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1344
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA107S
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy