NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
+1769%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
1536
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
122W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
