Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000M
1.615 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +1086%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
1344
Shading Units
6144
112
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
67.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
1.615 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
67.31 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
AD104
N14E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy