NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 153% (1950MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+12%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
