Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +315%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
8192
192
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy