Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +3189%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
48
192
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy