Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +5922%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
32
192
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
42W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy