Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +1444%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
2304
Shading Units
96
192
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
134W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy