NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1425MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+21%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro T1200 Mobile
2.918 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
855 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2304
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.60 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
91.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.837 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.918 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
91.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
18W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
